Light pulses make hairs drop out

Image 2 The laboratory marks the treatment areas on each leg. Photo: Tobias Meyer
The hair regrowth in the various treatment areas is assessed and photographed. Photo: Tobias Meyer
Laboratorietest

Smooth legs without shaving, pain or sticky creams? IPL technology uses light to remove the hair. But does it work and which device is best? Testfakta has tested five devices and compared the results.

Laboratorietest
Testfakta Research Published: 30 Aug, 2024

Unwanted hair growth is a problem for many women – and men. Regardless of opinions on beauty standards, excessive hair growth can be both bothersome and frustrating. Shaving, waxing, and epilation are perhaps the most common methods for getting rid of hair. The latter two, however, involve quite a bit of pain as the hairs are pulled out. IPL devices, on the other hand, remove hair using intense light.

They resemble electric razors in appearance, but instead of a shaving head at the front, the device emits strong light pulses through a small window – somewhat like the self-scanners in grocery stores.

[PDF]

Testfakta, on behalf of Procter & Gamble, tested five hair removal devices that use so-called IPL technology. All the tested devices were premium models, equipped with a mobile app to facilitate use. In simplified terms, the technology works by the light being absorbed by the pigment in the hair. The light is converted into heat, causing the hair follicle to enter a resting phase, after which the hair falls out. Regrowth is also inhibited, leading to a reduction in the amount of hair that grows back. This technique should not be confused with laser treatments that are only performed in salons.

– The light from IPL technology is generally completely harmless to the skin, provided that you follow the manufacturer's instructions on how to use the product, says Dr. Bettina König, project manager at SGS Fresenius, the independent testing laboratory in Austria that conducted the test.

You can also get IPL treatments in salons. In that case, the results are more permanent because the light pulses are stronger than those in home-use products.

Twenty women underwent five treatments over seven weeks. The legs were divided into ten sections – five on each leg – to compare the results. The panel also assessed how effective the devices were, how easy they were to use, and how the skin felt during and after the treatment. In parallel, ten specialists from beauty salons also tested and evaluated the devices and the accompanying mobile app.

After seven weeks of treatment, the results varied greatly among the different devices. Foreo had almost no effect at all, while Braun Skin i-expert and Philips Lumea 9000 reduced hair growth by 87% and 82%, respectively. Bettina König believes that a qualified evaluation can be made after seven weeks and five treatments.

– The number of treatments and how often they are performed varies between different products, but five sessions are enough to see results and draw conclusions from them. However, it should be noted that the technique does not work on light, red, or gray hair. Nor if you have dark or tanned skin. – IPL technology works best on dark hair, as it absorbs the light the most, explains Bettina König.

In addition to testing the effectiveness, both the consumer and specialist panels evaluated the user-friendliness, treatment of different body parts, and the functionality of the mobile app. Here, both groups preferred Braun, which was also clearly reflected in the response to the question of which device they would consider purchasing, where just over 80% chose Braun compared to 25-30% for Philips.

However, it should be noted that this type of treatment is not entirely free from discomfort for the user. The higher the hair removal effect, the higher the heat and some stinging.

 

Facts about the test

Testfakta Research, on behalf of Procter & Gamble, conducted a laboratory test of IPL devices (Intense Pulsed Light) in the premium segment. The purpose was to compare the quality of Braun Skin i-expert with comparable IPL products from leading manufacturers.
The laboratory test was carried out by the independent laboratory SGS Fresenius in Austria.

A total of five devices available on the Nordic market were tested:

  1. Braun Skin i-expert
  2. Philips Lumea 9000
  3. Silk'n Silk'n 7
  4. Beurer Velvet skin pro
  5. Foreo (Peach) 2

All devices are equipped with a mobile app to guide the user and facilitate the treatment.

Test Method
The test was conducted in two parts. In one part, the 20 test subjects underwent five treatments with the different devices over seven weeks. At each treatment session, the test subjects evaluated comfort and sensation during and immediately after treatment. A week after treatment, the lab experts measured and assessed the effect on hair regrowth.
In the second part, a specialist panel evaluated user-friendliness, access to different body parts, design, and the mobile app's functionality and assistance for the user.
All devices had masked product names during the tests.

Hair Reduction
The extent of hair reduction was measured each week and after a total of five treatments. The test was conducted on the legs of the test subjects, which were divided into five sections on each leg. Hair growth was assessed by the lab experts, both visually and based on high-resolution images of the different sections. The most emphasis was placed on the results after five treatments regarding hair reduction effects.

User Experience
All 20 panel participants rated all six products after each treatment and indicated how their skin felt, how pleasant the treatment was, how easy it was to perform, and how they perceived the product's design.

Specialist Assessment
The separate expert panel, consisting of ten individuals with professional experience using IPL devices, tested each product under the supervision of lab staff. Here, design, user-friendliness (both for the device itself and the mobile app), and how the skin felt both during and after treatment were assessed. The test was conducted on the inner and outer sides of the calves, forearms, and underarms.

Selection Criteria for Panel Members

  • Healthy women aged 18 to 65 years.
  • No known allergies or sensitivities.
  • Light brown to black hair color and skin tone II–IV on the Fitz-Patrick scale.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Very light hair growth.
  • White, gray, or red hair.
  • Dark or tanned skin.
  • Pregnant women.

Rating
The test results have been evaluated and rated in consultation with the laboratory. The rating was done on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is very poor and 10 is very good. The overall result has been weighted based on the following criteria:

  • Hair reduction: 50%
  • Treatment and manageability: 30%
  • Comfort and sensation: 10%
  • Mobile app functionality: 10%

TABLE OF TEST RESULTS